{"id":76821,"date":"2025-07-02T14:43:26","date_gmt":"2025-07-02T14:43:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/?p=76821"},"modified":"2025-07-02T14:43:26","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T14:43:26","slug":"why-cc-signals-an-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/2025\/07\/02\/why-cc-signals-an-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Why CC Signals: An Update"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"CC
CC Signals – An Update \u00a9 2025 by Creative Commons is licensed under CC BY 4.0<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Thanks to everyone who attended our CC signals project kickoff last week. We\u2019re receiving plenty of feedback, and we appreciate the insights. We are listening to all of it and hope that you continue to engage with us as we seek to make this framework fit for purpose.<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Some of the input focuses on the specifics of the CC signals proposal, offering constructive questions and suggesting ideas for improving CC signals in practice. The most salient type of feedback, however, is touching on something far deeper than the CC signals themselves \u2013 the fact that so much about AI seems to be happening to us all, rather than with or for us all, and that the expectations of creators and communities are at risk of being overshadowed by powerful interests.<\/p>\n

This sentiment is not a surprise to us. We feel it, too. In fact, it is why we are doing this project. <\/span>CC\u2019s goal<\/span><\/a> has always been to grow and sustain the thriving commons of knowledge and culture. We want people to be able to share with and learn from each other, without being or feeling exploited. CC signals is an extension of that mission in this evolving AI landscape. <\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

We believe that the <\/span>current practices of AI companies pose a threat to the future of the commons<\/span><\/a>. Many creators and knowledge communities are feeling betrayed by how AI is being developed and deployed. The result is that people are understandably turning to enclosure. Eventually, we fear that people will no longer want to share publicly at all.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

CC signals are a first step to reduce this damage by giving more agency to those who create and hold content. <\/span>Unlike the CC licenses<\/span><\/a>, they are explicitly designed to signal expectations even where copyright law is silent or unclear, when it does not apply, and where it varies by jurisdiction. We have listened to creators who want to share their work but also have concerns about exploitation. CC signals provide a way for creators to express those nuances.\u00a0 The CC signals build on top of <\/span>developing standards for expressing AI usage preferences<\/span><\/a> (e.g., via robots.txt). <\/span>Creators who want to fully opt out of machine reuse do not need to use a CC signal. CC signals are for those who want to keep sharing, but with some terms attached<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The challenge we’re all facing in this age of AI is how to protect the integrity and vitality of the commons. The listening we’ve been doing so far, across creator communities and open knowledge networks, has led us here, to CC signals. Our shared commitment is to protect the commons so that it remains a space for human creativity, collaboration, and innovation, and to make clear our expectation that those who draw from it give something in return.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Our goal is to advocate for reciprocity while upholding our values that knowledge and creativity should not be treated as commodities.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Our goal is to find a path between a free-for-all and an internet of paywalls.<\/span><\/p>\n

Copyright will not get us there. Nor should it. And we don\u2019t think the boundaries of copyright tell us everything we need to know about navigating this moment. Just this week, <\/span>Open Future released a report<\/span><\/a> that calls for going beyond copyright in this debate, on the path to a healthy knowledge commons.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is the beginning of the conversation, not the end. We are listening. From what we have heard, CC signals, or something like it, is the best practical mechanism to avoid the dual traps of total exploitation or total enclosure, both of which damage the commons. We have shared our current progress because we want to learn how to design it to meet your needs. We invite you to continue sharing feedback so we can shape CC signals together in a way that works for diverse communities. <\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>In the months ahead, we\u2019ll be providing more detail about how CC signals are developing, including key themes we are hearing, along with the questions we are exploring and our next steps.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CC Signals – An Update \u00a9 2025 by Creative Commons is licensed under CC BY 4.0 Thanks to everyone who attended our CC signals project kickoff last week. We\u2019re receiving plenty of feedback, and we appreciate the insights. We are listening to all of it and hope that you continue to engage with us as…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":76825,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3847,21],"tags":[144,2824],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76821"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76821"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76821\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76832,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76821\/revisions\/76832"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76825"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}